Difference between revisions of "Gas fermentation"

From Tech4Biowaste
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
m (Intro)
m (Feedstock)
Line 6: Line 6:


==Feedstock==
==Feedstock==
For a gas fermentation gaseous carbon sources are used as a feedstock. They can be delivered from a [[gasification]] of biomass or other organic materials (e.g. municipal solid waste, MSW) or directly be taken from a gas source like a [[Anaerobic digestion|biogas production]], an [[industrial fermentation|fermentation]], an industrial point source or directly from the atmosphere via a carbon capture technology.
For a gas fermentation, gaseous carbon sources are used as a feedstock. They can be sourced from the [[gasification]] of various organic materials (e.g., woody biomass, municipal solid waste, MSW), or directly be taken from a gas source like [[Anaerobic digestion|biogas]], an [[industrial fermentation|fermentation]], an industrial point source or directly from the atmosphere via a carbon capture technology.


== Process and technologies==
== Process and technologies==

Revision as of 14:57, 29 November 2021

Technology
21-04-27 Tech4Biowaste rect-p.png
Technology details
Name: Gas fermentation
Category:
Feedstock: Gaseous carbon source (CO, CO2, methane)
Product: several

A gas fermentation is an industrial fermentation process that uses a gaseous feedstock like methane, CO or CO2, and together with hydrogen, are converted by a living organism to produce a specific product like ethanol or butanol. Gas fermentation requires organisms that are able to use these kind of feedstock as main or single carbon source for their metabolism.

Feedstock

For a gas fermentation, gaseous carbon sources are used as a feedstock. They can be sourced from the gasification of various organic materials (e.g., woody biomass, municipal solid waste, MSW), or directly be taken from a gas source like biogas, an fermentation, an industrial point source or directly from the atmosphere via a carbon capture technology.

Process and technologies

Production organisms

The reductive acetyl–CoA pathway

A gas fermentation process depends on microorganisms that are able to digest gaseous carbon sources. Best known for this ability are acetogenic bacteria using the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway or acetyl-CoA pathway to fix and convert CO/CO2 and H2 to biomass and products. They are able to synthesize useful products such as ethanol, butanol and 2,3-butanediol and they are anaerobes so need to be used in an anaerobic, oxygen-free atmosphere, fermentation setting. For commercial applications, mainly strains from Clostridium ljungdahlii and C. autoethanogenum are used.[1][2] Others acetogenic bacteria are in development as production organisms and there is a lot of activity in synthetic biology and genetic/metabolism engineering to modify these organisms. Additionally there are developments to integrate the metabolic pathways into well-known non-acetogenic organisms like Escherichia coli or yeasts to expand the options for fermentation processes.[1] Besides, also aerobic bacteria can be used for gas fermentation. Aerobic hydrogen oxidizing bacteria, or Knallgas bacteria, are able fix CO2 using H2 as the electron donor and O2 as the terminal electron acceptor using the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle. Interestingly, this metabolism allows high biomass production and the synthesis of more complex products, including polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) bioplastics. As such, the Knallgas model organism Cupriavidus necator, formerly known as Alcaligenes eutrophus, can be used for the production of single-cell-protein (SCP) and natively accumulates polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB).

Fermentation technology

The overall gas fermentation process can be divided into four steps:[1]

  1. accumulation or generation of syngas
  2. gas pretreatment
  3. gas fermentation in a bioreactor
  4. product separation.

Depending on the gasified feedstock the syngas can have several impurities that lowers the productivity of the fermentation process or are toxic to the organisms. Even with gas-fermenting microorganisms' abilities to grow in the presence of low levels of impurities, some impurities necessitate near complete removal in a gas treatment by cyclone separators and filters from an operational, biological and/or product specificity perspective.[1]

In the gas fermentation step by itself the pre-treated and often cooled syngas is compressed and sparged into a bioreactor with the gas-fermenting microorganisms in an aqueous medium. Depending on the specific technologies a multitude of variables are to account for during gas fermentation. The yield and purity of the desired product depend e.g. on the bioreactor design, agitation, gas composition and supply rate, pH, temperature, headspace pressure, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), nutrients, and amount of foaming. As gas-fermenting microorganisms consume the gas, substrate availability can become rate-limiting and the bioreactor need to have a design that allows a high solubility of the gaseous substrates. In laboratory or small scale fermentation continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR) offer excellent mixing and homogenous distribution of gas substrates to the microorganisms and are most commonly used. In industrial scale other types like bubble column, loop, and immobilized cell columns are preferred due to high energy demand of the stirring.[1]

The design of a gas fermentation unit requires special attention as it involves the use of potentially explosive gas mixtures and toxic gases. With respect to the former, it should be in compliance with ATEX (ATmosphères EXplosibles) safety regulations. This is especially important in case of aerobic gas fermetentations, when a gas mixutre containing H2 (highly flammable) and O2 is sparged into the bioreactor.

After fermentation , product separation is required as post-treatment to separate the desired metabolic product from the fermentation broth. For this distillation systems are common to separate products such as ethanol and acetone. Other technologies to separate fermentation products from broth include liquid-liquid extraction, gas stripping, adsorption, perstraction, pervaporation, and vacuum distillation, and each of these separation technologies has their own benefits and drawbacks.[1]

Product

Products from a gas fermentation depend on the organism used and its specific metabolism. Examples can be different kinds of alcohols like ethanol, butanol or isobutanol, but also organic acids, proteins, hydrogen or bio-based polymers like polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs).

Technology providers

Technology comparison
Company name Country Technology category Technology name TRL Capacity [kg/h] Temperature [°C] Aerobic fermentation Anaerobic fermentation Feedstock: Food waste Feedstock: Garden & park waste Feedstock: CO Feedstock: CO2
Company 1 [Country HQ location] [Technology category (if different sub-categories are defined this has to be specified here, the available categories can be found on each technology page under the chapter Process and technologies)] [Technology name (the "branded name" or the usual naming from company side)] [4-9] [numeric value]
Company 2 [Country HQ location] [(if different sub-categories are defined this has to be specified here, the available categories can be found on each technology page under the chapter Process and technologies)] [Technology name (the "branded name" or the usual naming from company side)] [4-9] [numeric value]

Bio Base Europe Pilot Plant (BBEPP)

Gas fermentation provider
General information
Company: 21-04-27 Tech4Biowaste rect-p.png
Country:
Contact:
Webpage:
Technology and process details
Technology name: Technology category: Conversion (Biochemical processes and technologies)
TRL: Capacity: kg·h-1
Atmosphere: Nutrients:
pH: Pressure: bar
Temperature: °C Other:
Feedstock and product details
Feedstock: Product:

Bio Base Europe Pilot Plant (BBEPP) is a flexible and diversified pilot plant for the development and scale up of new, bio-based and sustainable processes. It is capable of development of new bioprocesses, optimization of existing processes and scale up of a broad variety of bio-based processes up to an industrial level (from 5L to 50m3 scale, depending on the process). It can perform the entire value chain, from the green resources up to the final product.

BBEPP has built up a significant expertise on gas fermentation and cultivation of acetogenic and Knallgas bacteria through several private collaborations with Arcelor Mittal, e.g. Valorco project and in an ISPT project with Syngip, Arcelor Mittal and Dow. Although the content of these private projects is confidential, the general experience gained will be helpful in the work aimed for in the proposed work. In addition, BBEPP is also involved in several European funded consortium based gas fermentation projects. In the BIOCONCO2 project, BBEPP is responsible for the construction mobile gas fermentation unit to be put on site at waste gas emitters and to convert these CO2-rich gases into chemical building blocks. In the BIOSFERA project, biogenic residues and wastes will be gasified and the syngas will be fermented using acetogenic bacteria to produce acetate which will be converted in a second fermentation process to bio-based triacylglycerides (TAGs). In the CO2SMOS project, biogenic CO2 emissions and renewable H2 are converted by innovative biotechnologica land intensified chemical conversion process to develop the production of several bio-based fine and commodity chemicals (2,3-butanediol, long chain dicarboxylic acids, benzene, cyclic carbonates and polyhydroxyalkanoates).

Coskata

...

LanzaTech

...

INEOS Bio

...

Vlemish Institute of Technology (VITO)

...

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

...

Patents

Currently no patents have been identified yet.

References

  1. a b c d e f FungMin Liew, Michael E. Martin, Ryan C. Tappel, Björn D. Heijstra, Christophe Mihalcea, Michael Köpke, 2016-05-11: Gas Fermentation—A Flexible Platform for Commercial Scale Production of Low-Carbon-Fuels and Chemicals from Waste and Renewable Feedstocks. Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 7, . doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00694
  2. Mark J. Burk, Stephen Van Dien, 2016-03: Biotechnology for Chemical Production: Challenges and Opportunities. Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 34, (3), 187–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.10.007